Dr. Craig: The Moral Argument for God (Full Video)
Zachary Moore Permalink
6 comments
Goosing the Antithesis
We promote rational individualism, and are opposed to those who assert incoherent supernatural claims.
Monday, August 27, 2007
Contributors
Links
(and our blogs)- ExChristian.Net
- StrongAtheism.Net
- Graveyard of the Gods Board
- Graveyard of the Gods Ministry
- The Radical Libertarian
- Check Your Premises
Reading the Antithesis
Check out these blogs
- Incinerating Presuppositionalism
- Kill The Afterlife
- Hellbound Alleee
- Debunking Christianity
- Black Sun Journal
- The Secular Outpost
- Richard Carrier Blogs
- The Dilettante Exegete
- 10,000 Reasons to Doubt the Fish
- Cyberspace Rendezvous
- Memoirs of an ex-Christian
- Kingdom of Heathen
- UberKuh
- The Pagan Prattle
- Skeptico
- Meet An Atheist
- Deep Thoughts
- Schade-Colored Glasses
Selected past posts
Morality FAQ
The War of Morality
Values and Materialism
Euthyphro's Dilemma
The Role of Morality in Religion
The Christian Virtues
Christian Celebrations of Death
Christians Cannot Account For Morality
Moral Development and Christianity
Regressive Christian Morality
Moral Projection in Christianity: Part 1 and Part 2
The Immorality of Belief: Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3
Moral Responsibility: Part 1 and Part 2
Relativism: Part 1 and Part 2
The Morality Disconnect: Part 1 and Part 2
Religious Rejection of a Moral Being
The Parasitic Nature of Evil
The Virtue of Honesty
The Virtue of Justice
The Virtue of Non-Sacrifice
The Virtue of Non-Coercion
The Moral Razor
The Problem of Induction
The Asymmetry of Immaterialism
Refuting God's Nature
If Knowledge Then No God
The Three Types of Order
Miracles and Materialism
Religious Language
Proving a Negative
Meaning and Belief
The Block Universe Explained
Kalvinism's Kausal Konfusion
The First Intention-Giver Argument
The "More To Life" Argument
What is Proof? Part 1 and Part 2
Argumentum ad Bananum
Argumentum ad Ridiculum
Comfort Concedes
Christian Moral Hypocrisy
A Chimpanzee's Grandson
Kicking Ass For Jesus
God is a Fag
The Sound of One Man Talking
Faith and Reason: Part 1
Faith and Reason: Part 2
Faith and Reason: Part 3
The God That Wasn'€™t at Church
Why is Mary Crying?
Christians Gotta Have Heart
The Christian's Rapist Wit
Sin is Just Bad Genes?
Are Christian Women Crazy?
The Christian Marriage Problem
Lee Strobel
Jay Richards
Stephen Meyer
Michael Behe
Questions and Answers
Final Thoughts
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
Post a Comment
6 Comments:
"Faith and Reason" ... arent those two things mutually exclusive?
It depends a bit on how you define them. Kevin's gone on record rejecting the Hebrews 11 definition of faith as meaningful to Christianity.
What it really describes is the desire of Christians (specifically, Christian apologists) to preserve intellectual honesty while still maintaining their religious belief.
Not an easy task, by any means...
I think god could be replaced in this argument very easily to make it sound more valid...
1. If Societies do not exist, then there are no objective moral values and duties.
2. There are objective moral values and duties.
3. Therefore Societies exists.
I do not think objective moral values and duties are derived from any god. I think the are grown through social interaction.
I agree- his first premise is easily the weakest (although I would contest the way he defines "objective moral values" also).
Is this the same William Lane Craig who claims the genocide is acceptable if God decrees it?
The same Craig who writes ''The act was morally obligatory for the Israeli soldiers in virtue of God’s command, even though, had they undertaken it on their on initiative, it would have been wrong.'
From Slaughter of the Canaanites
The very same act is either right or wrong, according to William Lane Craig, depending upon who ordered it.
How then can the same act always be either morally right or morally wrong?
If God created all of physical reality including all life then He has the right to set up the rules anyway He wishes. He gave us life and He alone has the right to take it away. In other words, He "owns" us. He also has the right to interact with the Creation in anyway He deems necessary to fulfill His purposes. Why should God be obligated to obey the same rules that He has given to us? As a parent, do you follow the same rules you give to your kids?
<< Home