Paul Manata making a fool of himself again
God is for Suckers made an entry about the Dan Barker-Paul Manata debate.
Manata comes across as an angry thug. You can hear him constantly scribbling notes, his voice cracks and he stammers constantly, and the rage that goes back to his violent, drug abusing days vibrates just below the surface of everything he says.
Most of his arguments are petty and fail to address any of the sweeping contradictions Dan points out. He keeps trying to push Dan into a semantic corner: “Did I say that? When did I say that? Define that. What do you mean when you say that?”
Good ol' Paul. Still making a fool of himself after all these years.